A Brief History of Baseball
Part III: Labor Battles in the Modern Era
Professional baseball players had organized several times in
baseball history, but they were never able to make the advances
that unions in other industries had won for their members. The
Major League Baseball Players Association had been around for
more than thirty years, but its sole purpose had been to collect
and administer a meager pension. Concerned about getting a piece
of growing television revenues, the players sought to strengthen
their union in 1965.
They hired Marvin Miller, a veteran labor organizer who had
fought for the United Steelworkers union for years. He knew there
was more at stake than adding broadcasting money to the pension
fund. When Miller came on board and saw what the conditions were,
he knew much more was at stake.
For one thing, the minimum salary was $6,000, just a thousand
dollars more than it had been in 1947. As he began to collect
data, the players were surprised at how poorly they were being
paid. This education paved the way for the first collective
bargaining agreement in 1968. It provided some modest
improvements, but most importantly it gave the players some
leverage. For nearly a hundred years, team owners had a
“take it or leave it” relationship with players. The
union could (and did) file complaints with the National Labor
Relations Board when they were treated unfairly. Players also won
the right to have their grievances heard before an independent
arbitrator.
The owners did not like this. They did not like the union
interfering in their business, and they did not like the players
standing up to them. Curt Flood, one of the league’s premier
centerfielders refused to report to training camp in 1969,
demanding that the St. Louis Cardinals offer more than a $5000
raise. They relented, but after an unexceptional season, they
traded him to Philadelphia. Flood did not want to go. He had
strong ties to the community, and filed a suit against
Commissioner Bowie Kuhn. Flood argued that the Reserve Clause was
illegal, and that he should be allowed to negotiate freely with
other teams. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled against him, but
it made a lot of players think.
By 1975, two pitchers decided to challenge the reserve clause
again. It said that the teams had the right to renew a players
contract for one year. They interpreted that to be recurring,
that they could renew it every year. Dave McNally and Andy
Messersmith refused to sign their contracts. If the reserve
clause bound them for the 1975 season, there was no contract that
could be renewed for 1976. An arbitrator upheld their case, and
free agency was born.
Players were still bound to a team for the first few years of
their career, but after that they could sign with any team. The
owners couldn’t contain their excitement at this, and spent
the next five years outbidding and outspending each other. The
players were happy, because everyone’s salary was going up.
But many owners were getting upset. When a player left, they got
nothing in return. They argued that a team who lost a player
should get something in return for compensation. Otherwise, the
money they had invested in that player’s development would
be lost. The players argued that this would severely limit their
freedom. The two sides couldn’t agree, so in the middle of
the 1981 season the players walked out.
There had been a brief player’s strike at the start of
the 1972 season, which delayed the start of the season by 13
days. This was much more serious, and little negotiation took
place. After fifty days, the owners relented and agreed to a
modified compensation plan. In return, players not yet eligible
for free-agency could have their salaries decided by an
arbitrator. The economic issues was growing more complicated, and
the adversarial relationship between owners and players grew more
intense.
In 1985, the players struck again. The owners had hoped that
salary arbitration would help keep salaries down, but it
propelled them through the roof. The owners wanted to change it,
the players said no way. After two days, the owners relented and
the players came back.
Then the free-agent market suddenly and mysteriously dried up.
Following the 1986 season, players in search of contracts found
no bidders, and many re-signed with their teams for lower
salaries. This continued for the next few years, until an
arbitrator ruled that the owners had colluded. The collective
bargaining prohibited that action, and the players were awarded
damages.
This all set the stage for the worst battle of all. In 1992,
the owners forced Commissioner to resign. The labor contract was
about to expire, and they didn’t want him to interfere in
negotiations. Turns out they didn’t want any negotiations
either. Their had been a strike or a lockout every time the
collective bargaining agreement expired, and the players
didn’t want to go through that again. They started the 1994
season without a contract. The owners were insisting that a
salary cap was necessary for teams to survive. They claimed free
agency and salary arbitration were wrecking them. No progress was
being made, so the players went on strike in August.
The World Series was canceled for the first time in 92 years.
Fans across the country were disgusted and heartbroken. President
Clinton appointed a mediator, but nothing happened. Finally, the
owners decided to unilaterally implement their own plan. They
assembled teams of replacement players and set out to start the
1995 season without the “real” players. The players
asked for and got a restraining order, prohibiting the teams from
implementing their plan and forcing them to work under the terms
of the old agreement until a new one was reached.
It took almost two more years for a labor deal to be reached,
and it finally happened in November of 1996. While it’s too
soon to tell if the deal will address the financial problems that
face Major League Baseball, it does offer the hope that fans can
start thinking about the game on the field once again. Baseball
has fallen behind other American sports in popularity, and it
will take a lot of work to regain the prominence it once held in
American culture. There is a long, proud history to build on, and
baseball will enter its third century with reasons for optimism.
[originally published in December 1996]
|